COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (2024)

COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (1)

COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (2)

  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (3)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (4)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (5)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (6)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (7)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (8)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (9)
  • COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (10)
 

Preview

wes CASE NUMBER: 502018CA0077 15XXXXMB Division: AN ****Filing # 73721001 E-Filed 06/18/2018 03:51:49 PMIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FORPALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDACASE NO.:CAROL D. GOODWIN,Pl aintiffa*gREEUNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,Defendant./COMPLAINTPlaintiff, CAROL D. GOODWIN (hereinafter interchangeably referred to as “Plaintiff”or “Goodwin”), sues Defendant, UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCECOMPANY (hereinafter interchangeably referred to as “Defendant” or “Universal”), and allegesas follows:General Allegations1. This is an action for damages in excess of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) exclusive ofinterest, fees and costs.2. Atall material times, Plaintiff was a resident of Palm Beach County, FL, who ownedproperty located in Palm Beach County, Florida and was/is otherwise sui juris.3. At all material times hereto, Defendant, Universal, was Florida for-profit corporationduly. licensed to transact insurance business in the State of Fiorida, and doing business,maintaining offices, and/or maintaining agents for the transaction of its customarybusiness in Palm Beach County, Florida.4, Prior to 8/17/2017, Plaintiff sought and purchased homeowner's jnsurance fromDefendant to cover the property located at 14462 82™ Lane North, Loxahatchee, PalmBeach County, FL 33470 (hereinafter referred to as “the Property”). Said policy of .+ Z . + APRA AANA ASAE Ainente tine wnfnuead tr ac “thoinsurance, bearing policy number 1501-12U3-loz0 Widisiauer Terciica Ww a5 uleCHEN. DAIAARECACUAAIINTY Cl CUADAND ANY FL EDY neMainn4a n2-£4-A0 DAAHILL. PAL DLA VUUINE TT, 1, OHI. DUUN, ULLIAN, Yur ure tu Ul. Lt vtPolicy”), was issued by Defendant to Plaintiff to provide insurance coverage whichincluded, but was not limited to, protecting the Property against water damage.5. The Policy was issued by Defendant to Plaintiff and was in full force and effect as of8/17/2017. A copy of the policy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.6. On or about 8/17/17, Plaintiff's Property suffered a water leak which caused damages toit (hereinafter referred to as “the loss”).7. Plaintiff timely reported the loss to Defendant, who assigned it claim number FL17-0124680. ;8. However, Defendant has failed to fully indemnify and completely compensate Plaintiff'sloss, and has underpaid the claim instead.9. Defendant has failed to fully indemnify the Plaintiff for the loss, despite the fact thatDefendant was contractually obligated to do so pursuant to the Policy.COUNT I1—- BREACH OF CONTRACT Mt arer 8 tn wed wn acnaute aneneeanhe ana theanch nin: tPlaintiff ve-alleges and re-asserts paragraphs one through nine above as if fully set forthherein, and further alleges as follows: 10, Despite the obligation to pay the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the loss, Defendanthas failed to fully indemnify the Plaintiffs for same, though the loss is covered under thePolicy, and, thus, has breached the Policy.11, Plaintiff has been damaged monetarily in regard to the loss by the failure of theDefendant to honor and comply with its contractual obligations under and pursuant to thePolicy.12. All pre-requisites or conditions precedent to the filing of this action have been satisfied,met or waived.an a Atk 2d ett nee AL tha DNafandanta aandunt the aintLs. AS a GITECL alG prOximMae Tesi G1 Wie Weiciuane s Conuuc, the Plaintiff has heenobligated to retain legal counsel to bring this action and, pursuant to sec, 627.428 Fla.Stat., as well as others, the undersigned counsel is entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs inthis matter to be paid by Defendant. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Court to award damages in Plaintiffs favor, andagainst Defendant, as well as attomevs’ fees, costs, prefudement interest, and any and alladditional relief that this Court deems just and proper.DEMAND FOR JURY TRIALPlaintiff demand trial by jury of all issues so triable.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this document will be servedon the Defendant aiong with the Summons in inis aétidii.Dated this 18" day of June, 2018.Respectfully Submitted,SILVER, BASS & BRAMS, P.A.Counsel for Plaintiff500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 800West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6237Telephone: (561) 659-0551Facsimile: (561) 835-6866Primary: edocuments@FLLitigation.comSecondary: abass@FLLitigation.comSecondary: mjordan@FLLitigation.comSecondary: jraimondi@FLlitigation.comBy: ___/s/ Monica JordanMONICA E. JORDANF.B.N. 112031AARON 8. BASSF.BN. 0166261CAROL GOODWIN14462 82ND LN N LOXAHATCHEE, FL 33470 HOMEOWNERS POLICY“2 POLICY, NUMBER 21501-1203-1626"DEAN VOLID DOI ICV CAPREFIII Vv"RORY PuUn VEE) Vm VELThis is a legal contract between the policyholder and the company. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE:1110 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 300Fort Lauderdale, FL. 33309Customer Service: 800-425-9113 You can get protection:through the National. FloocInsurance, Program. ; Call. This policy jacket with the Policy Provisions, Declarations and Endorsem*nts, if any, issued to form a part thereof, complete the policy.EXHIBIT 74°Notice of Premium Discounts for Hurricane Loss Mitigation *** Important Information ***About Your Personal Residential Insurance Policy Dear Homeowner,Hurricanes have caused tens of billions of dollars in insured damages and predictions of morecatastrophic hurricanes making landfall in Florida have triggered increases in insurance premiums to coverpotential future losses. Enclosed is information regarding wind loss mitigation that will make your home moreresistant to wind and help protect your family during a catastrophic event. In addition to reducing yourwind nrer ination fealiras, vou may alsa reduce the likalihood of aut of nackatexpenses, such: as your hurricane deductible, you may otherwise i incur after a catastrophic event. What factors are considered in establishing my premium? Your location: The closer a home is to the coast, the more vulnerable it is to damage caused by hurricanewinds. This makes the hurricane-wind premium higher than for similar homes in other areas of the state.Your policy: Your insurance policy is divided into two premiums: one for damage caused by hurricane forcewinds (hurricane-wind) and one for all other damage (all perils), such as fire.Your deductible: Under the Jaw, you are allowed to choose a $500, 2%, 5% or 10% deductible, depending 0 onthe actual value of your home. The larger your deductible, the lower your hurricane-wind premium. However, ifyou select a higher deductible your out-of-pocket expenses in the event of a hurricane claim will be higher.Improvements to your home: The state requires insurance companies to offer discounts for protecting yourhome against damage caused by hurricane winds. Securing your roof so it doesn't blow off and protecting yourwindows from flying debris are the two most cost effective measures you can take to safeguard your home andreduce your hurricane-wind premium. These discounts apply only to the hurricane-wind portion of your policy. |The costs of the improvement projects vary. Homeowners should contact a licensed contractor foran estimate. You can find a Certified Contractor in your area by visiting the Florida Department of Businessand Professional Regulation online at www.myfloridalicense.com.Your maximum discount: Discounts are not calculated cumulatively. The total discount is not the sum of theindividual discounts. Instead, when one discount is applied, other discounts are reduced until you reach yourmaximum discount of 88%. \How can | take advantage of the discounts?Homeowners will need a qualified inspector such as a general, building, or residential contractorlicensed under Section 489.111, Florida Statutes, or a professional engineer licensed under Section 471.015,Florida Statutes, who has passed the appropriate equivalency test of the Building Code training program asrequired by Section 553.841, Florida Statutes, or a professional architect licensed under Section 481.213,Florida Statutes, or a building code inspector certified under Section 468.607, to inspect the home to identify |potSiitial Mugauon Measures aha Veniy mMmprovernies. FOr a usuig Ot malviadals @nuor mispecuan Compares.meeting these qualifications contact your insurance agent or insurance company. The following is an example of how much you can reduce your insurance premium if you havemitigating features on your home. The example is based on your hurricane-wind premium* of $1,428.59which Is part of your total annual premium of $2,875.00. Remember, the discounts shown only apply tothe hurricane-wind portion of the premium and the discounts for the construction techniques andfeatures listed below are not cumulative.* Wind mitigation credits apply to that portion of your premium that covers the peril of wind, whetheror not a hurricane exists.OIR-B1-1655 (Rev.02/10) Adopted by Rule 690-170.0155 1Homes built prior to the 2001 building code | | Estimatea* | EstimateaPremium AnnualDescription of Feature Discount Percent | Premlum isReduced by:Roof Covering (1.2... shingles or tiles)* Meets the Florida Building Code A% $57.14* Reinforced Concrete Roof Deck 82% $4,171.44n your home you most likely will not* Using a 2" nail spaced a 6" from the edge of the plywood and 12" in the field of the 0% $0.00plywood* Using a 2 1/2" nail spaced a 6" from the edge of the plywood and 12” in the field of 9% $128.57the plywood* Using a 2 1/2" nail spaced a 6” from the edge of the plywood and 8" in the fleld of 9% $128.57the plywood :Seconday Water Resistance (SWR): not SQR){Standard underlayments or hot mopped fels are not SW)* SWR, Self adhering polymer modified bitumen roofing underlaymentapplied directly to the sheathing of foam SWR Barrier (not foamed on 6% $85.72insulation) applied as a secondary means to protect the dwelling fromteintean infeveatesrs*NoSWR 0% $0.00Roof-to-Wall Connection* Using “Toe Nails" - defined as 3 nails are driven at an angle through the rafter and 0% $0.00into the top roof.* Using Clips - defined as pieces of metal that are nailed into the side of the 30% $428.58rafter/truss and Into the side of the top piate or wall stud "* Using Single Wraps - a single strap that is attached to the side and/or bottom of the 30% $428.58top plate and are nailed to the rafteritruss* Using Double Wraps - straps are attached to the side and/or bottom of the top plate 30% $428.58and are nailed to the rafter/truss 7* None 0% $0.00* Intermediate Type - shutters that are strong enough to meet half the old Miami- 20% 9905.79Dade building code standards c* Hurricane Protection Type - shutters that are strong enough to meet the currentMiami-Dade building code standards 30% yeeeeRoof Shape* Hip Roof - defined as your roof sloping down to meet all your outside walls (like apyramid), 30% $428.58* Other 0% sn.a0 OIR-B1-1 * Estimate is based on information currentty on file and the actual amount may vary. The Uniform Mitigation Verification Inspection Form is required andsigned by a licensed contractor to receive the credit.655 (Rev.02/10) Adopted by Rule 690-170.0155Homes under the 2001 building code or later ||i‘Estimated” Estimated \Description of Feature Det betel Hpeninan iReduced by: |iHomes built under the 2004 Florida Building Code or later edition (also including the 1994 !South Florida Bullding Code for homes In Miami-Dade and Broward Counties) are eligible for a iminimum 68% discount on the hurricane-wind portion of your premium. You may be eligible for 'greater discount if other mitigation features are installed on your home. /|‘Shutters |* None 0% $0.00 {* Intermediate Type - shutters that are strong enough to mect half the old Miami- 20% $285.72Dade building code standards* Hurricane Protection Type - shutters that are strong enough fo meet the currentMiami-Dade building code standards 30% iianineRoof Shape* Hip Roof - defined as your roof sloping down to meet all your outside walls (like a 30% $428.58pyramid). : : : eee : oman* Other 0% $0.00 * Estimate is based on information currently on file and the actual amount may vary. The Uniform Mitigation Verification Inspection Form is required andsigned by a licensed contractor to receive the credit.Altemaiely ana regardiess of the year of construction, if you meet tne minimum tixture and constructionrequirements of the 2001 Florida Building Code you have the option to reduce your hurricane-wind deductiblefrom__to__If you have further questions about the construction techniques and features or other construction techniquesand features that could result in a discount, please contact your insurance agent or the insurance company at4(800)-425-9113. OIR-B1-1655 (Rev.02/10) Adopted by Rule 690-170.0155 3Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company Homeownersi Vaan auieclo Universal Risk Advisors pecan ean Reet14110 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 300 sepGER TTFort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Renewal PolicyToll Free: 800-425-9113 :Claims: 800-218-3206 Service: Contact your Agent Listed BelowPolicy Number FROM Policy Period TO [MORTGAGEE BILLED] Agent Code1501-1203-1626 12/05/2017 12/05/2018 12:01 AM Standard Time BD49Named Insured and Address and AddressCarol Goodwin Gamer Financialee id Ln N . 22681 SW53 Ave., FL 33470 Boca Raton, FL 33433(et) 596-1887 (561) 482-6703Premium SummaryBasle Coverages Attached Endorsem*nts Total Policy PremiumPremium Premium Assessments / Surcharges MGA Fees/Policy Fees (chiding Assessments & Surcharges)$7,060.35 ($4,460.36) $248.00 $27.00 $2,875.00Location 001Townhouse? Number of ProtectionForm Construction Year Rewhouse PF Occunled Class Territory BCEGHO3 | Masonry 1996, N 1 TY et 3 38 99.Dwelling Protective Device Credits: Wind / HeilCounty Replacement Cost Home Updated Burglar Fire Sprinkler Shutter ExclusionPalm Beach Y Y None None N N N ‘We will provide the insurance described in this policy in return for the premium and compliance with all applicable pro’of this policy. If we elect to continue this insurance, we will renew this policy if you pay the required renewal premium for eachsuccessive policy period subject to our premiums, rules and forms then in effect. You must pay us prior to the end of thecurrant noliey nariod or el Insurance is provided only with respect to the following coverages for which a limit of liability is specified, subject to all theconditions of this policy. COVERAGES -SECTION| LIMITS PREMIUMS | COVERAGES - SECTION I LIMITS PREMIUMSCoverage “Ac Dwelling $866,736 $7,060.36 | Coverage-E- Personal Liability $300,000 $18.00Coverage -B- Other Structure $40,677 Coverage -F- Medical Payments $3,000 $5.00Coverage -C- Personal Property $107,021 i 7Coverage -D- Loss of of Use $71,348 Sy, NOTE: ‘The portion of your premium for hurricane coverage is: $1,428.59__The portion of your premium for all other coverages is: $1,446.41Section 1 coverages subject to a minimum 2.0% - $7,135 hurricane deductible per calendar year.Section 1 coverages subject to $2,500 non-hurricane (non-sinkhole) deductible per loss.DESCRIBED LOCATION - The Described Location covered by this policy is at the above address unless otherwise stated:14462 82nd Ln N Loxahatchee, FL 33470THIS POLICY CONTAINS A SEPARATE DEDUCTIBLE FOR.HURRICANE LOSSES WHICH MAY RESULT IN HIGH OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES TO YOU, _rersal Pro Prop ad ‘Casualty Insurance Company and is not part of this policy.| Flo| Countersignature Date Chief Executive Officer UPCIC HO003 (02/12) Printed Date: 5/30/2018 10:25:16 AM 10f3Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Companyclo Universal Risk Advisors EE eT eee1110 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 300 ‘2705/2017Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Renewal PolicyToll Free: 800-425-9113 7Claims: 800-218-3206 Service: Contact your Agent Listed BelowPolicy Number. FROM Policy Period TO [MORTGAGEE BILLED] Agent Code1501-1203-1626 12/05/2017 12/05/2018 12:01 AM Standard Time Bb4gMortgagee / Additional Interest 01 Agent Name and AddressWells Fargo Bank, N.A. #936 ISAOA Gamer FinancialPO Box 100515 22681 SW 53 Ave.Elaranan OO DQ5N9 Bana Dainn Cl 29499Fidrence, cu 2vcue BOCA RET, Ph CoFOS0541159794 (561) 482-6703Additional InterestMortgagee/Additional Interest 01 Mortgagee/Additional Interest 02 Mortgagee/Additional Interest 03Weils Fargo Bank, N.A. #936. ISAOAPO Box 100515Florence, SC 295020541159794MortgageePolicy Forms and Endorsem*nts Applicable to this PolicyNUMBER EDITION DESCRIPTION LIMITS PREMIUMSHOOOO30491 Homeowners 3 Special Form 7 cane $7,060.35‘UPCIC 03 33 07 08 Limited Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot, or Bacteria Section | - $10,000/$20,000;Section Hf - $50,000UPCIC 3 01 98 Outline of Your Homeowner PolicyUPCIC 25 01 98 (06-07) ‘Hurricane DeductibleUPCIC 23 08 16 ‘Special Provisions - FloridaUPCIC 19.01 98 ‘Windstorm Protective Devices ($4,432.00)UPCIC 16 01 98 Loss Assessment Coverage $1,000HO 23 70 06 97 ‘Windstorm Exterior Paint or Waterproofing Endorsem*ntHO 04 96 04 91 No Coverage for Home Day Care BusinessHO 04 48 04 91 Other Structures $40,877 $20.00UPCIC 10 01 98 (06-07) Existing Damage ExclusionPersonal Property Inctease/Decrease $107,021 (871.35)‘Year Built Surcharge $248.00Personal Liability Increase Endorsem*nt $300,000 $18.00Medical Payment Increase Endorsem*nt $3,000 $5.00Emergency Management Preparedness Assistance Trust Fund $2.00MGA Fee $25.00 LAW AND ORDINANCE COVERAGE IS AN IMPORTANTCOVERAGE THAT YOU MAY WISH TO PURCHASE. YOU MAYALSO NEED TO CONSIDER THE PURCHASE OF FLOODINSURANCE FROM THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCEPROGRAM. WITHOUT THIS COVERAGE, YOU MAY HAVEUNCOVERED LOSSES. PLEASE DISCUSS THESECOVERAGES WITH YOUR INSURANCE AGENT.COINSURANCE CONTRACT: THIS POLICY CONTAINS A CO-PAY PROVISION THAT MAY RESULT IN HIGH OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES TO YOU.UPCIC HOODS (02/12) Printed Date: 5/30/2018 10:25:16 AM 20f3Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Companyclo Universal Risk Advisors Declaration Effective4110 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 300 12/05/2017Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Renewal PolicvToll Free: 800-425-9113 EClaims: 800-218-3206 Service: Contact your Agent Listed BelowPolicy Number FROM Policy Perlod TO {MORTGAGEE BILLED] Agent Code1501-1203-1626 1205/2017 12/05/2018 12:01 AM Standard Time BD49 YOUR POLICY PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR A CATASTROPHIC GROUNDCOVER COLLAPSE THAT RESULTS IN THE PROPERTY BEING CONDEMNEDAND UNINHABITABLE. OTHERWISE, YOUR POLICY DOES NOT PROVIDECOVERAGE FOR SINKHOLE LOSSES. YOU MAY PURCHASE ADDITIONALCOVERAGE FOR SINKHOLE LOSSES FOR AN ADDITIONAL PREMIUM.This replaces all previously issued policy declarations, if any and is subject to all forms and endorsemonts attached to this policy.UPCIC HO003 (02/12) Printed Date: 5/30/2018 10:25:16 AM 3ofsChecklist OT CoveragePolicy Type: 1501-1203-1626 Homeowners (Indicate: Homeowner's, Condominium Unit Owner's, Tenant's, Dwelling, or Mobile Home Owner's) The following checklist is for informational purposes only. Florida law prohibits this checklist from changing any of theprovisions of the insurance contract which is the subject of this checklist. Any endorsem*nt regarding changes in types ofcoverage, exclusions, limitations, reductions, deductibles, coinsurance, renewal provisions, cancellation provisions,surcharges, or credits will be sent separately.Reviewing this checklist together with your policy can help you gain a better understanding of your policy's actualcoverages and limitations, and may even generate questions. By addressing any questions now, you will be moreprenarad later in the avent of a Exo shown that many auestions tend fo arise reaardina the coverade ofattached or detached screened pool ‘enclosures, screened porches, and other types of enclosures. Likewise, if yourpolicy insures-a condominium unit, questions may arise regarding the coverage of certain-items, such as individualheating and air conditioning units; individual water heaters; floor, wall, and ceiling coverings; built-in cabinets and countertops; appliances; window treatments and hardware; and electrical fixtures. A clear understanding of your policy'scoverages and limitations will reduce confusion that may arise during claims settlement. Please refer to the policy for details and any exceptions to the coverages listed in this checklist. All coverages are subjectto the provisions and conditions of the policy and any endorsem*nts. If you have questions regarding your policy, pleasecontact your agent or company. Consumer assistance is available from the Department of Financial Services, Division ofConsumer Services’ Helpline at (800) 342-2762 or www.fidfs.com.This form was adopted by the Florida Financial Services Commission. Dwelling Structure Coverage (Place of Residence)Limit of Insurance: $356,736 Loss Settlement Basis: Replacement Cost(i.e.: Replacement Cost, Actual Cash Value, Stated Value, etc.) Other Structures Coverage (Detached from Dwelling)Limit of Insurance: $40,677 Loss Settlement Basis: Replacement Cost(ie.: Replacement Cost, Actual Cash Value, Stated Value, etc.) Personal Property CoverageLimit of Insurance: $107,021 Loss Settlement Basis: Actual Cash Value(Le.: Replacement Cost, Actual Cash Value, Stated Value, etc.) Deductiblesno, e7 4nk All Darile/Athar than hurrinana 2 oinlhalals — ¢9 RAN22-91, 100 AIL Sins(Vunet wan Nuricane & omanue), — yeu OIR-B1-1670 (1-1-08) . 10f3|{|Checklist of Coverage (continued)The above Limit of Insurance, Deductibles, and Loss Settlement Basis apply to the following perils insured against:(Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS included, those marked N (No) indicate coverage is NOT included) _[Y | Fire or Lightning HurricaneFlood (Including storm surge)Windstorm or Hail (other than hurricane)ExplosionRiot or Civil CommotionAircraftVehiclesSmokeVandalism or Malicious MischiefTheftFalling ObjectsWeight of Ice, Snow or SleetAccidental Discharge or Overflow of Water or Steam Sudden and Accidental Tearing Apart, Cracking , Burning or BulgingFreezing * 7 7Sudden and Accidental Damage from Artificially Generated Electrical CurrentVolcanic EruptionSinkholeAny Other Peril Not Specifically Excluded (dwelling and other structures only) ~)2|<|<|<|<1<|<|<|<])<|<| <|<1<|<|<]2]< Snoci:SpeckLoss of Use CoverageCoverage | Limit of Insurance [ Time Limit(Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS included, those marked N (No) indicate coverage is NOT included)Y | Additional Living Expense $71,347Y |Fair Rental Value $71,347Y [Civil Authority Prohibits Use $71,347 2 Weeks Property - Additional/Other Coverages {Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS Limit of Insurance Amount of insurance is an additional amount ofincluded, those marked N (No) indicate coverage is coverage or is included within the policy limit.NOT included)Included AdditionalY [Debris Removal xY IRaaennahla Ranaire xY pReasonanle Repairs ?Y {Property Removed xY | Credit Card, Electronic Fund Transfer Card, or $500 xAccess Device, Forgery and Counterfeit MoneyY |Loss Assessment xY |Collapse xXY |Glass or Safety Glazing Material XxY jLandlord's Furnishings $2,500 xY {Law and Ordinance $89,184 xY | Grave Markers $5,000 xY |Mold / Fungi $10,000/$20,000 x OIR-B1-1670 (1-1-06) : 2o0f3Checklist of Coverage (continued) Discounts (Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate discount IS applied, those marked N Dollar Dollar ($) Amount of Discount(8) Amount of Discount (No) indicate discount is NOT applied)) zMultiple Policy Fire Alarm / Smoke Alarm / Burglar AlarmSprinkler Windstorm Loss Reduction $4,432 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule zlzj<|z|zOther Insurer May Insert Any Other Property Coverage Below {Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS Limit of Insurance Loss Settlement Basis:included, those marked N (No) Indicate coverage is (ie.: Replacement Cost, Actual Cash Value,NOT included) Stated Value, etc.) Personal Liability CoverageLimit of Insurance: $300,000 Medical Payments to Others CoverageLimit of Insurance: $3,000 Liability - Additional/Other Coverages (Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage IS | Limitof insurance — [Amount of insurance is an additional amount ofincluded, those marked N (No) indicate coverage is coverage or is included within the policy limit.NOT included}Included AdditionalY |Claim Expenses xXY |First Aid Expenses xY |Damage to Property of Others $500 xY |Loss Assessment $1,000 x Insurer May Insert Any Other Liability Coverage Below (Items below marked Y (Yes) indicate coverage |S included, those marked N(No) Limit of InsuranceIndicate coverage is NOT included) OIR-B1-1670 (1-1-06) 3 of3HOMEOWNERSHO 00 03 04 91HOMEOWNERS 3SPECIAL FORM AGREEMENT We will provide the insurance described in this policy in return for the premium and compliance with all applica-hla nrauiciane af thie naliawBIG proviorons Cr une poney. DEFINITIONS In this policy, "you" and “your” refer to the "namedinsured" shown in the Declarations and the spouse ifa resident of the same household. "We," "us" and"our" refer to the Company providing this insurance.In addition, certain words and phrases are defined asfollows:1. "Bodily injury" means bodily harm, sickness ordisease, including required care, loss of servicesand death that results.2. "Business" includes trade, profession or occupa-tion. :3. "Insured" means you and residents of your house-hold who are:b. Other persons under the age of 21 and in thecare of any person named above.Under Section Il, “insured” also means:c. With respect to animals or watercraft to whichthis policy applies, any person or organizationlegally responsible for these animals or water-craft which are owned by you or any person in-cluded in 3.a. or 3.b. above. A person or or-ganization using or having custody of theseanimals or watercraft in the course of any"business" or without consent of the owner isnot an "insured";d. With respect to any vehicle to which this policyapplies:(1) Persons while engaged in your employ orthat of any person included in 3.a. or 3.b.above} oF(2) Other persons using the vehicle on an“insured location" with your consent.4, "Insured location" means:a, The "residence premises";b. The part of other premises, other structuresand grounds used by you as a residence and:(1) Which is shown in the Declarations; or{2) Which is acquired by you during the policyperiod for your use as a residence;HO 00 03 0491onCopyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1990c. Any premises used by you in connection with apremises in 4.a. and 4.b. above;d. Any part of a premises:(1) Not owned by an "insured"; and(2) Where an "insured" is temporarily residing;e. Vacant land, other than farm land, owned by orrented to an "insured";f. Land owned by or rented to an "insured" onwhich a one or two family dwelling is beingbuilt as a residence for an "insured";g. Individual or family cemetery plots or burialvaults of an "insured"; or for. "Occurrence" means an accident, including con-tinuous or repeated exposure to substantially thesame general harmful conditions, which results,during the policy period, in:a. "Bodily injury"; orb. "Property damageUenenets dneaaall manne nhuntnal Tarrriupsry Gamage iieans puysica imyury w, Ge-struction of, or loss of use of tangible property. . "Residence employee" means:a. An employee of an "insured" whose duties arerelated to the maintenance or use of the "resi-dence premises," including household or do-mestic services; orb. One who performs similar duties elsewhere notralatad ty tha “hieinace" af an Mincuirad ". "Residence premises" means:a. The one family dwelling, other structures, andgrounds; orb. That part of any other building;where you reside and which is shown as the "resi-dence premises" in the Declarations."Residence premises" also means a two familydwelling where you reside in at least one of thefamily units and which is shown as the "residencepremises" in the Declarations.Page 1 of 18SECTION | - PROPERTY COVERAGES COVERAGE A — DwellingWe cover:1. The dwelling on the “residence premises" shownin the Declarations, including structures attachedto the dwelling; and . MaleiiaIs iG SuppNes Gata Gi SF Text 1 ine“residence premises" used to construct, alter orrepair the dwelling or other structures on the "resi-dence premises."This coverage does not apply to land, including landon which the dwelling is located.COVERAGE B — Other StructuresWe cover other structures on the "residence prem-jena" eat anart fram dusallina hw alaar enana Thieseo Sot Gparn won Gwening oy Cian Space. imsincludes structures connected to the dwelling by onlyafence, utility line, or similar connection.This coverage does not apply to land, including landon which the other structures are located.We do not cover other structures:4. Used in whole or in part for "business"; or2. Rented or held for rental to any person not a ten-ani of ine dwelling, uniess used solely as a privategarage.The limit of liability for this coverage will not be morethan 10% of the limit of liability that applies to Cover-age A. Use of this coverage does not reduce theCoverage A limit of liability.COVERAGE C — Personal PropertyWe cover personal property owned or used by antt thn .“aSurea” Wine i iS anywhere ia wie Word, At yourTequest, we will cover personal property owned by:1. Others while the property is on the part of the“residence premises" occupied by an "insured";2. A guest or a "residence employee," while theproperty is in any residence occupied by an "in-sured."Our limit of liability for personal property usuallyIneated at an “inctirad’s" racidence other than thePresidence premises," is‘ 10% ¢ of tl the timit of liability forCoverage C, or $1000, whichever is greater. Personalproperty in a newly acquired principal residence is notsubject to this limitation for the 30 days from the timeyou begin to move the property there.Special Limits of Liability. These limits do not in-crease the Coverage C limit of liability. The speciallimit for each numbered catego! below is the totalnN? Page 2 of 18Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 19904. $200 on money, bank notes, bullion, gold otherthan goldware, silver other than silverware, plati-num, coins and medals.2. $1000 on securities, accounts, deeds, evidencesof debt, letters of credit, notes other than banknotes, manuscripts, personal records, passports,tickets and stamps. This dollar limit applies tothese categories regardless of the medium (suchas paper or computer software) on which the ma-terial exists.This limit includes the cost to research, replace orrestore the information from the lost or damagedmaterial.3. $1000 on watercraft, including their trailers, fur-as eaninmant and outhnard enainas or moWs, eauinment and outhoard engines or mo tors.4. $1000 on trailers not used with watercraft.5. $1000 for loss by theft of jewelry, watches, furs,Precious and semi-precious stones.6. $2000 for loss by theft of firearms.7. $2500 for loss by theft of silverware, silver-platedware, goldware, gold-plated ware and pewlerware.This Wickes NawWare, NOUsWwaie, ta Sets, Waysand trophies made of or including silver, gold orpewter.8. $2500 on property, on the "residence premises,"used at any time or in any manner for any "busi-ness" purpose.9. $250 on property, away from the "residence prem-ises," used at any time or in any manner for any“business" purpose. However, this limit does notapply to loss to adaptable electronic apparatus asdescribed in Special Limits 10, and 11. below.40. $1000 for loss to electronic apparatus, while in orupon a motor vehicle or other motorized land con-veyance, if the electronic apparatus is equipped tobe operated by power from the electrical systemof the vehicle or conveyance while retaining itscapability of being operated by other sources ofpower. Electronic apparatus includes: a. Accessories or antennas; orb. Tapes, wires, records, discs or other media;for use with any electronic apparatus.HO 00 03 04 9111.$1000 for loss to electronic apparatus, while not inor upon a motor vehicle or other motorized landconveyance, if the electronic apparatus:a. Is equipped to be operated by power from theelectrical system of the vehicle or conveyancewhile retaining its capability of being operatedby other sources of power;b. Is away from the "residence premises"; andc,Is used at any time or in any manner for any"business" purpose.Electronic apparatus includes:a. Accessories and antennas; orb. Tapes, wires, records, discs or other media;for use with any electronic apparatus.Property Not Covered. We do not cover:4. Articles separately described and specificallyinsured in this or other insurance;2. Animals, birds or fish;3. Motor vehicles or all other motorized land con-veyances. This includes:a. Their equipment and accessories; orb. Electronic apparatus that is designed to be ymotorized land conveyances. Electronic appa-ratus includes:(1) Accessories or antennas; or(2) Tapes, wires, records, discs or other media;for use with any electronic apparatus.The exclusion of property described i in 3. a.ia 3.6. above appues Giy wie wie propenyis In or upon the vehicle or conveyance,We do cover vehicles or conveyances not subjectto motor vehicle registration which are:a. Used to service an "insured's" residence; orb. Designed for assisting the handicapped;4. Aircraft and parts. Aircraft means any contrivanceused or designed for flight, except model or hobbyaircraft not used or designed io carry peopie orcargo;5. Property of roomers, boarders and other tenants,except property of roomers and boarders relatedto an "insured";6. Property in an apartment regularly rented or heldfor rental to others by an “insured," except as pro-vided in Additional Coverages 10.; “residence premises";HO 00 03 04 91 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 19908. "Business" data, including such data stored in:a. Books of account, drawings or other paperrecords; orb. Electronic data processing tapes, wires, records, discs or other software media;However, we do cover the cost of blank recordingor storage media, and of pre-recorded computerprograms available on the retail market; or9, Credit cards or fund transfer cards except asprovided in Additional Coverages 6.COVERAGE D —- Loss Of UseThe limit of liability for Coverage D is the total limitfor all the coverages that follow.4. If a loss covered under this Section makes thatpart of thi “residence premises” where you residenot fi itthe following. However, if the “residence oanises" is not your principal place of residence, wewill not provide the option under paragraph b. be-low.a. Additional Living Expense, meaning anynecessary increase in living expenses incurredby you so that your household can maintain itsnormal standard of living; orb. Fair Rental Value, meaning the fair rentalvalue of that part of the "residence premises"where you reside less any expenses that donot continue while the premises is not fit to livein,Payment under a. or b. will be for the shortesttime required to repair or replace the damage or,if you permanently relocate, the shortest time re-quired for your household to settle elsewhere.2. If a loss covered under this Section makes thatpart of the “residence premises" rented to othersor held for rental by you not fit to live in, we coverthe:Fair Rental Value, meaning the fair rentalvalue of that part of the “residence premises"rented to others or held for rental by you lessany expenses that do not continue while thenramieae ie not fit fa live inPrommges to ot mn ie nye HePayment will be for the shortest time required torepair or replace that part of the premises rentedor held for rental.3. If a civil authority prohibits you from use of the“residence premises" as a result of direct damageto neighboring premises by a Peril Insured Againstin this policy, we cover the Additional Living Ex-pense and Fair Rental Value loss as provided un-der 1. and 2. above for no more than two weeks. Page 3 of 18The periods of time under 1., 2. and 3. above are notlimited by expiration of this policy.We do not cover loss or expense due to cancellationof a lease or agreement.ADDITIONAL COVERAGES1, Debris Removal. We will pay your reasonableexpense for the removal of:maken at ina nets fm D,@ veons Or COversu propery u arAgainst that applies to the damaged propertycauses the loss; orb. Ash, dust or particles from a volcanic eruptionthat has caused direct loss to a building orproperty contained in a building.This expense is included in the limit of liability thatapplies to the damaged property. If the amount tobe paid for the actual damage to the property plusthe debris removal expense is more than the limitof liability for the damaged property, an additional5% of that limit of liability is available for debrisremoval expense.We will also pay your reasonable expense, up to$500, for the removal from the "residence prem-ises" of:a. Your tree(s) felled by the peril of Windstorm orusnmb. Your tree(s) felled by the peril of Weight of Ice,Snow or Sleet; orc. A neighbor's tree(s) felled by a Peril InsuredAgainst under Coverage C;provided the tree(s) damages a covered structure.The $500 limit is the most we will pay in any oneloss regardless of the number of fallen trees.%. Reasonabie Repairs. in the event inat coveredproperty is damaged by an applicable Peril In-sured Against, we will pay the reasonable cost in-curred by you for necessary measures takensolely to protect against further damage. If themeasures taken involve repair to other damagedproperty, we will pay for those measures only ifthat property is covered under this policy and thedamage to that property is caused by an applica-Bla Daril Inevirad AnainatDie ret nioureu mgauionThis coverage:a. Does not increase the limit of liability thatapplies to the covered property;b. Does not relieve you of your duties, in case ofa loss to covered property, as set forth inSECTION I - CONDITION 2.d. _ Page 4 of 18Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 19903. Trees, Shrubs and Other Plants. We covertrees, shrubs, plants or lawns, on the "residencepremises," for loss caused by the following PerilsInsured Against: Fire or lightning, Explosion, Riotor civil commotion, Aircraft, Vehicles not owned oroperated by a resident of the "residence prem-ises," Vandalism or malicious mischief or Theft.We will pay up to 5% of the limit of liability that or lawns. No more than $600 of this limit will beavailable for any one tree, shrub or plant. We donot cover property grown for "business" purposes.This coverage is additional insurance.4, Fire Department Service Charge. We will pay upto $500 for your liability assumed by contract oragreement for fire department charges incurredwhen the fire department is called to save or pro-tect covered property from a Peril insuredAgainst. We do not cover fire department servicecharges if the property is located within the limitsof the city, municipality or protection district fur-nishing the fire department response.This coverage is additional insurance. No deducti-ble applies to this coverage.5. Property Removed. We insure covered propertyfnact Ios from any cause while heina Temoved from a premises ; endangered by: a PerilInsured Against and for no more than 30 dayswhile removed. This coverage does not changethe limit of liability that applies to.the property be-ing removed,6. Credit Card, Fund Transfer Card, Forgery andCounterfeit Money.We will pay up to $500 for:a. The legal obligation of an "insured" to paybecause of the theft or unauthorized use ofcredit cards issued to or registered in an "in-sured's" name;b, Loss resulting from theft or unauthorized useof a fund transfer card used for deposit, with-drawal or transfer of funds, issued to or regis-tered in an “insured's" name; ¢. Loss io an “insured” caused by forgery or ai-teration of any check or negotiable instrument;andd. Loss to an "insured" through acceptance ingood faith of counterfeit United States or Ca-nadian paper currency.HO 00 03 04 91We do not cover use of a credit card or fundtransfer card:a. By a resident of your household;b. By a person who has been entrusted with ei-ther type of card; orc. If an "insured" has not complied with all termsand conditions under which the cards are is-sued.All loss resulting from a series of acts committedby any one person or in which any one person isconcerned or implicated is considered to be oneloss.We do not cover loss arising out of "business" useor dishonesty of an "insured."This coverage is additional insurance. No deducti-ble applies to this coverage.Defense:a. We may investigate and settle any claim orsuit that we decide is appropriate. Our duty todefend a claim or suit ends when the amountwe pay for the loss equals our limit of liability.b. If a suit is brought against’ an "insured" forliability under the Credit Card or Fund TransferCard coverage, we will provide a defense atour expense by counsel of our choice.c. We have the option to defend at our expensean "insured" or an “insured's" bank against anysuit for the enforcement of payment under theForgery coverage.7. Loss Assessment. We will pay up to $1000 foryour share of loss assessment charged during thepolicy period against you by a corporation or as-eariatinn of nranarty qwnare whan tha accace.SOCancn Sy propery CMners,ment is made as a result of direct loss to theproperty, owned by all members collectively,caused by a Peril Insured Against underCOVERAGE A — DWELLING, other than earth-quake or land shock waves or tremors before, dur-ing or after a volcanic eruption.This coverage applies only to loss assessmentscharged against you as owner or tenant of theUennidanan neaminns WTesracnce promises.We do not cover loss assessments chargedagainst you or a corporation or association ofproperty owners by any governmental body.The limit of $1000 is the most we will pay with re-spect to any one loss, regardless of the number ofassessments.Condition 1. Policy Period, under SECTIONS |AND I CONDITIONS, does not apply to this cov-erage.HO 00 03 04 91Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 19908. Collapse. We insure for direct physical loss tocovered property involving collapse of a buildingor any part of a building caused only by one ormore of the following:a. Perils Insured Against in COVERAGE C —PERSONAL PROPERTY. These perils applyto covered buildings and personal property forloss insured by this additional coverage;b. Hidden decay;; Hidden insect or vermin damage;d. Weight of contents, equipment, animals orpeople;. Weight of rain which collects on a roof; orf. Use of defective material or methods in con-struction, remodeling or renovation if the col-lapse occurs during the course of the construc-tion, remodeling or renovation.Loss to an awning, fence, patio, pavement, swim-ming pool, underground pipe, flue, drain, cess-pool, septic tank, foundation, retaining wall, bulk-head, pier, wharf or dock is not included underitems b., ¢., d., @., and f. unless the loss is a di-rect result of the collapse of a building.Collapse Goes no not include settling, cracking,, DuIguig oF SxpalThis coverage does not increase the limit of liabil-ity applying to the damaged covered property.9, Glass or Safety Glazing Material.We cover:a. The breakage of glass or safety glazing mate-tial which is part of a covered building, stormdoor or storm window; andb, Damage to covered property by glass or safetyglazing material which is part of a building,storm door or storm window.This coverage does not include loss on the "resi-dence premises" if the dwelling has been vacantfor more than 30 consecutive days immediatelybefore the loss. A dwelling being constructed isnot considered vacant.° LOSS foi damage t gla8s Will be Settled Gi the ba-sis of replacement with safety glazing materialswhen required by ordinance or law.This coverage does not increase the limit of liabil-ity that applies to the damaged property.Page 5 of 1810.Landlord's Furnishings. We will pay up to$2500 for your appliances, carpeting and otherhousehold furnishings, in an apartment on the“residence premises" regularly rented or held forrental to others by an "insured," for loss causedonly by the following Perils Insured Against:a. Fire or lightning.b, Windstorm or hail.This peril does not include loss to the propertycontained in a building caused by rain, snow,sleet, sand or dust unless the direct force ofwind or hail damages the building causing anopening in a roof or wall and the rain, snow,sleet, sand or dust enters through this opening.This peril includes loss to watercraft and theirtrailers, furnishings, equipment, and outboardnaines or motors, only while Je a fully en-closed building.c. Explosion.d. Riot or civil commotion.e. Aircraft, including self-propelled missiles andspacecraft.f. Vehicles.g. Smoke, meaning sudden and accidental dam-age from smoke.This peril does not include loss caused bysmoke from agricultural smudging or industrialoperations.h. Vandalism or malicious mischief.i. Falling objects.This peril does not include loss to propertycontained in a building unless the roof or anoutside wall of the building is first damaged bya falling object. Damage to the falling object it-self is not included.J. Weight of ice, snow or sleet which causesdamage to property contained in a building.k. Accidental discharge or overflow of wateror steam from within a plumbing, heating, airconditioning or automatic fire protective sprin-Kiet SyStein OF HOTT Within @ NOUSEHOG appi-ance. This peril does not include loss:(1) To the system or appliance from which thewater or steam escaped;(2) Caused by or resulting from freezing ex-cept as provided in the peril of freezing be-low; or(3) On the “residence premises" caused byaccidental discharge or overflow which oc-curs off the "residence premises.”In this peril, a plumbing system does not in-clude a sump, sump pump or related equip-ment.Sudden and accidental tearing apart, crack-ing, burning or bulging of a steam or hot wa-ter heating system, an air conditionimatic fire Protective sprinkler system, or an@ppuance tor heautig water.We do not cover loss caused by or resultingfrom freezing under this peril. m. Freezing of a plumbing, heating, air condition-ing or automatic fire protective sprinkler sys-tem or of a household appliance.This peril does not include loss on the "resi-dence premises" while the dwelling is unoccu-nied, unless vou have used raaconahle cara to:NOU, UINCSS YOu Mave WouU Teauoraete Core we(1) Maintain heat in the building; or(2) Shut off the water supply and drain thesystem and appliances of water.n. Sudden and accidental damage fromartificially generated electrical current.This peril does not include loss to a tube, tran-sistor or similar electronic component.o. Volcanic eruption other than loss caused byearthquake, land shock waves or tremors.The $2500 limit is the most we will pay in any oneloss regardless of the number of appliances, car-peting or other household furnishings involved inthe loss. SECTION | —- PERILS INSURED AGAINST COVERAGE A —- DWELLING and COVERAGE B — 41. Involving collapse, other than as provided in Addi-OTHER STRUCTURES tional Coverage 8.;bar insure against risk of direct loss to Property cal 2. Caused by:AandB only i t los ee WA ake maLy. VG GO TOL Page 6 of 18 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1990 HO 00 03 04 91HO 00 03 04 91a. Freezing of a plumbing, heating, air condition-ing or automatic fire protective sprinkler sys-tem or of a household appliance, or by dis-charge, leakage or overflow from within thesystem or appliance caused by freezing. Thisexclusion applies only while the dwelling is va-cant, unoccupied or being constructed, unlessyou have used reasonable care to:JAN Minintnin basUy Maitian fe ng, Of(2) Shut off the water supply and drain thesystem and appliances of water;b. Freezing, thawing, pressure or weight of wateror ice, whether driven by wind or not, to a:(1) Fence, pavement, patio or swimming pool;(2) Foundation, retaining wall, or bulkhead; or(3) Pier, wharf or dock;c. Theft in or to a dwelling under construction, orof materials and supplies for use in the con-struction until the dwelling is finished and

Related Contentin Palm Beach County

Case

HALSTEAD, PILAR V HERITAGE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 24, 2024 |Luis Delgado |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-007026-XXXA-MB

Case

RATHELL, RICHARD V VYRD INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 23, 2024 |Scott R. Kerner |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006873-XXXA-MB

Case

CORNEILLE, KARLY V CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

Jul 17, 2024 |Gregory M. Keyser |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006893-XXXA-MB

Case

SMITH, MURAT V PEOPLES TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 22, 2024 |Jaimie R. Goodman |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006865-XXXA-MB

Case

DE JESUS, EDWIN V AMERICAN INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA

Jul 18, 2024 |G. Joseph Curley |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006725-XXXA-MB

Case

EDGERTON, SIMONE A V TYPTAP INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 23, 2024 |Scott R. Kerner |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006907-XXXA-MB

Case

NEUROSURGICAL CONSULTANTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC V CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 18, 2024 |John J. Parnofiello |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006735-XXXA-MB

Case

MURPHY, THOMAS V AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP

Jul 19, 2024 |Reid P. Scott, II |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006806-XXXA-MB

Ruling

Hofmeyer VS Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Jul 25, 2024 |Civil Unlimited (Insurance Coverage (not complex)) |RG20061553

RG20061553: Hofmeyer VS Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois 07/25/2024 Hearing on Motion in Limine Special Set Motions in Limine; filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (Defendant) in Department 520Tentative Ruling - 07/22/2024 Julia SpainSafeco's Motion #1 re: Priority and Exhaustion of Insurance Coverage and Plaintiffs Motion #1to Exclude Evidence of Other Insurance Coverage are continued to August 9, 2024 at 2pm inDept. 520. This continuance is not subject to contest.

Ruling

HEANG KROUCH, ET AL. VS PR2020, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Aug 01, 2024 |21STLC06411

Case Number: 21STLC06411 Hearing Date: August 1, 2024 Dept: 20 Tentative Ruling Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 20 Hearing Date: August 1, 2024 Case Name: Krouch, et al. v. PR2020, LLC, et al. Case No.: 21STLC06411 Matter: Motion for Sanctions Moving Party: Defendant PR2020, LLC Responding Party: Unopposed Notice: OK Ruling: The Motion is granted in part. Moving party to give notice. If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic. On May 2, 2023, a Second Amended Complaint (SAC) was filed relating to the failure to pay attorneys fees after losing an unlawful detainer action and to repair property pursuant to commercial leases. On June 23, 2023, a Cross-Complaint was filed relating to the failure to pay rent. On April 5, 2024, the Court granted Defendant PR2020, LLCs three motions to compel responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests of production from Plaintiff Robert Gooch. The Court required responses within 30 days. Defendant now seeks terminating, issue, evidentiary, and/or monetary sanctions because Gooch failed to comply with the Courts April 5, 2024, ruling. California discovery law authorizes a range of penalties for conduct amounting to misuse of the discovery process. (Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 967, 991.) Misuses of the discovery process include [u]sing a discovery method in a manner that does not comply with its specified procedures (Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.010(b)); [f]ailing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery (id., subd. (d)); [m]aking an evasive response to discovery (id., subd. (f)); and [d]isobeying a court order to provide discovery (id., subd. (g).) Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030 authorizes a trial court to impose monetary sanctions, issue sanctions, evidence sanctions, or terminating sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. In selecting the appropriate sanction, a trial court should consider both the conduct being sanctioned and its effect on the party seeking discovery, and should tailor the sanction to fit the harm caused by the abuse of the discovery process. (Doppes, supra, 174 Cal.App.4th at p. 992.) The trial court cannot impose sanctions for misuse of the discovery process as a punishment. (Ibid.) A terminating sanction is a proper sanction to punish the failure to comply with a rule or an order only if the courts authority cannot be vindicated through the imposition of a less severe alternative. (Rail Services of America v. State Comp. Ins. Fund (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 323, 331 [concerning dismissal for a plaintiffs refusal to comply with discovery]; see also Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 262, 279-80 [[W]here a violation is willful, preceded by a history of abuse, and the evidence shows that less severe sanctions would not produce compliance with the discovery rules, the trial court is justified in imposing the ultimate sanction.].) Plaintiff Gooch did not file an opposition such that it seems that Gooch is not interested in participating in discovery. Therefore, the Court will enter a terminating sanction by striking Goochs SAC, striking his Answer to the Cross-Complaint, and entering his default. The Court will not award any other sanctions. The Motion is granted in part as set forth herein. Moving party to give notice. If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ruling

Patricia Ortega vs. California Fair Plan Association

Jul 25, 2024 |24CECG00294

Re: Patricia Ortega v. California Fair Plan Association Superior Court Case No. 24CECG00294Hearing Date: July 25, 2024 (Dept. 403)Motion: Defendant California Fair Plan Association’s Demurrer to Plaintiff Patricia Ortega’s Complaint If oral argument is timely requested, it will be entertained on Thursday, August 1, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403.Tentative Ruling: To overrule defendant California Fair Plan Association’s demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc.§ 430.10, subd. (e).) Defendant California Fair Plan Association is granted 10 days’ leaveto file its answer to the complaint. The time in which the answer can be filed will run fromservice by the clerk of the minute order.Explanation: A complaint for declaratory relief must demonstrate: (1) a proper subject ofdeclaratory relief, and (2) an actual controversy involving justiciable questions relating tothe rights or obligations of a party. (Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital (1989)208 Cal.App.3d 405, 410.) The “actual controversy” requirement concerns the existenceof present controversy relating to the legal rights and duties of the respective partiespursuant to contract, statute, or order. (Id.) A proper subject would be a determinationof any question of construction or validity arising under an instrument or contract, or adeclaration of the parties’ rights or duties. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1060.) The interpretationof ordinances and statutes are proper matters for declaratory relief. (Walker v. LosAngeles County (1961) 55 Cal.2d 626, 637 Here, plaintiff had a property policy with defendant. (Compl., ¶ 4.) She requestedclaim related documents pursuant to California Insurance Code section 2071. (Compl.,¶ 23.) The underlying dispute is centered on whether the independent adjuster reportsand photographs fall within the definition of a claim related document. (Compl., ¶ 26,27.) Plaintiff seeks a judicial determination of the rights and obligations of the partiesunder the insurance code. (Compl., ¶ 32.) These facts as pled in the complaint are taken as true and thus present a plausiblecause of action – there is an actual controversy between the parties that is subject todeclaratory relief. Plaintiff would be entitled to relief, though what relief need not bedetermined at this time. The plaintiff’s intent and the merits of plaintiff’s claims are issuesthat can be argued and a demurrer is not the method by which they should be discussedor decided. Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice may be granted to the extent thatdemonstrates such records exist, but not for the truths of any of the matters assertedtherefrom. (Steed v. Dept. of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120-121.) Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Proceduresection 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute orderadopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerkwill constitute notice of the order.Tentative RulingIssued By: JS on 7/24/2024 . (Judge’s initials) (Date)

Ruling

CAMERON BERTA VS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION

Jul 26, 2024 |24BBCV00113

Case Number: 24BBCV00113 Hearing Date: July 26, 2024 Dept: NCB Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles North Central District Department B cameron berta, Plaintiff, v. state farm mutual automobile insurance company, Defendant. Case No.: 24BBCV00113 Hearing Date: July 26, 2024 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to strike BACKGROUND A. Allegations Plaintiff Cameron Berta (Plaintiff) alleges that this action involves an insurance breach of contract and bad faith arising from an insurance claim Plaintiff made to his insurer, Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) in connection with sideswipe damage to Plaintiffs 2017 Bentley Bentayga. Plaintiff alleges that on March 28, 2022, while Plaintiffs wife Emma Harutunyan was driving the vehicle, it was damaged as a result of a sideswipe collision with a dumpster that was jutting into Coldwater Canyon Avenue. Plaintiff alleges that despite submitting a claim and overwhelming evidence of comprehensive automobile policy benefits due and owing, Defendant refused to pay the policy benefits owed to Plaintiff. He alleges that Defendant was presented with evidence proving that the loss was caused by a covered event, including damage that directly corresponded point of impact, admission of fault by Plaintiff, and nearly 200 pages of testimony under oath, but Defendant did not adequately consider such information and evidence, and did not reasonably adjust the claim. He alleges that Defendant has failed and refused to pay Plaintiff under the terms of his insurance policy for the damage caused to his vehicle and Defendants refusal to honor its clear obligations under the policy was unjustified and unacceptable. Thus, Plaintiff filed this action to recover damages and punitive damages for Defendants bad faith mishandling of his insurance claim. The complaint, filed January 16, 2024, alleges causes of action for: (1) breach of contract; and (2) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. B. Motion on Calendar On June 18, 2024, Defendant filed a motion to strike the punitive damages portions of Plaintiffs complaint. On July 15, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an opposition brief. On July 18, 2024, Defendant filed a reply brief. DISCUSSION Defendant moves to strike portions of the complaint alleging punitive damages. (See Notice of Motion at pp. 2-4; Compl., ¶13 at lines 16-20, 4:11-12, 5:22-23, ¶ 48 at lines 5-7, 6:9, 49:11-13, ¶51, ¶52 at lines 19-21, ¶53, ¶55, 7:9-10, ¶78, and Item 2 of the prayer.) A complaint including a request for punitive damages must include allegations showing that the plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) A claim for punitive damages cannot be pleaded generally and allegations that a defendant acted "with oppression, fraud and malice" toward plaintiff are insufficient legal conclusions to show that the plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. (Brousseau v. Jarrett (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 864, 872.) Specific factual allegations are required to support a claim for punitive damages. (Id.) Civil Code § 3294 authorizes a plaintiff to obtain an award of punitive damages when there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in malice, oppression, or fraud. Section 3294(c) defines the terms in the following manner: (1) "Malice" means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. (2) "Oppression" means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. (3) "Fraud" means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. In the complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant unjustly, unreasonably, and maliciously denied Plaintiffs claim for insurance benefits related to his covered loss after Plaintiff had promptly filed its claim with Defendant, Defendant without justification denied Plaintiffs claim on April 29, 2022, and Defendant again denied Plaintiffs claim on January 20, 2023 under the false pretenses that Plaintiff failed to cooperate with the investigation. (Compl. at 4:11-12, ¶¶31-42, Ex. A [January 20, 2023 Denial Letter].) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant knew Plaintiffs claim was covered under the insurance policy prior to issuing the January 20, 2023 denial letter, Defendant had no reasonable basis to conclude that the damage was man-made and intentionally inflicted, such that Defendants denial was on pretextual grounds as an act of malice towards Plaintiff intended to subject him to unjust hardship in conscious disregard of his rights. (Compl. at 5:22-23, ¶¶44-48.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant maliciously refused to tender the benefits to Plaintiff due to the high value of the vehicle and corresponding magnitude of loss and that Defendants denial demonstrated deliberate intent to cause injury to Plaintiff, the denial was a malicious effort to create artificial evidentiary hurdles to oppress Plaintiff and deprive him of the benefits under the policy, and Defendant knowingly and falsely asserted that the damage was man-made and intentionally inflicted to delay plaintiff from obtaining insurance benefits. (Compl. at 6:9-10, ¶¶49-53.) Paragraph 55 alleges: Plaintiff is informed and believes that State Farms malicious, oppressive, and fraudulent attempts to deprive him of his rights under the insurance contract are part of a broader pattern and practice of denying high-value property damage claims in furtherance of an unlawful profit scheme, in violation of Insurance Code § 790.03(h), that deprives affected individuals of their contractual, common-law, and/or statutory rights by forcing them to engage in protracted and costly litigation against State Farm in situations where State Farms liability is reasonably clear. (Compl., ¶55.) In the 2nd cause of action, he alleges that Defendants bad faith conduct was intentional malicious, wanton, and oppressive, with a willful and conscious disregard of Plaintiffs rights under the policy and with intent to deprive Plaintiff of the coverage that Defendant represented Plaintiff would receive, such that section 3294 punitive damages are warranted to punish and deter Defendant from engaging in similar conduct in the future. (Compl., ¶78.) The January 20, 2023 letter is attached as Exhibit A to the complaint. In the letter, Defendant states that it has completed its investigation regarding the claim and that Defendant has denied the claim due to a breach of the insureds duties regarding the insureds duty to cooperate and violation of the concealment or fraud provision in the policy. Defendant states that its forensic automobile mechanical engineer thoroughly investigated the vehicle and obtained Plaintiff and Emma Harutyunyans examination under oath (EUO), which revealed that that damage did not occur as they claimed; rather, the physical evidence was grossly inconsistent, and the damage was man-made and intentionally inflicted. The letter included portions of the policy stating that there was no coverage for intentionally damaged vehicles; delineated the insureds duties regarding notice of the accident and the insureds duties to cooperate; and that there is no coverage for false statements with the intent to conceal or misrepresent material facts or circ*mstances. As currently worded, the complaint fails to allege specific facts that Defendant acted intentionally, maliciously, oppressively, or with fraud when denying Plaintiffs claim. Based on the allegations of the complaint, Defendant investigated Plaintiffs claims, undertook their own analysis on how the accident occurred, requested documents from Plaintiff, and ultimately denied coverage after months of review. At most, Plaintiff has alleged that he submitted an insurance claim to Defendant, Defendant conducted an investigation, and Defendant denied the claim, which was contrary to the result Plaintiff was anticipating. While the Court takes the allegations of the complaint as true, including allegations regarding Defendants intentionality or malicious/oppressive behavior to deny the claim, such allegations must be alleged with the requisite specificity in order to pursue punitive damages. Currently, the allegations are general and conclusory. Moreover, the Plaintiff has attached Defendants position regarding the claim. Defendants position and Plaintiffs position represent opposing viewpoints, and state mere opinions. There are no specific facts from which it can be determined whether either position is true or untrue. It may be that based on discovery the Plaintiff can show specific statements that are true or untrue and that were made knowing of their truth and for a malicious purposes, but for now what is shown from the few facts alleged is a conflict of opinions regarding the evidence. For these reasons, the motion to strike the allegations for punitive damages is granted with leave to amend. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companys motion to strike is granted with 20 days leave to amend. Defendant shall give notice of this order. DATED: July 26, 2024 ___________________________ John Kralik Judge of the Superior Court

Ruling

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE...

Jul 25, 2024 |Civil Unlimited (Insurance Coverage (not complex)) |23CV050245

23CV050245: FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE vs WARREN, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF FARMERS' COMPLAINT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; filed by Andrew Warren (Defendant) + in Department 20Tentative Ruling - 07/22/2024 Karin SchwartzThe Demurrer filed by Angela Warren, Andrew Warren, Matthew Warren on 03/01/2024 isOverruled.Defendants Andrew Warren, Angela Warren, and Matthew Warren’s demurrer isOVERRULED.Defendants Andrew Warren, Angela Warren, and Matthew Warren’s motion to strike isDENIED.Defendants Andrew Warren, Angela Warren, and Matthew Warren’s motion for stay isGRANTED. The stay pending resolution of the underlying case is appropriate as the declaratoryrelief complaint turns on facts to be litigated in the Sacramento personal injury action.BACKGROUNDPlaintiff Farmers Insurance Exchange (“Plaintiff” or “Farmers”) filed a complaint for declaratoryrelief on November 6, 2023 against Andrew Warren, Angela Warren, Matthew Warren(collectively, “the Warrens” or “Defendants”), Kevin McKenney, Angel Sanchez, Daisy Ramirezand Javier Zacharias regarding a motor vehicle accident in September 2022.In July 2023, McKenney and Sanchez filed a complaint against Matthew Warren, AndrewWarren, and Daisy Ramirez in Sacramento County Superior Court, McKenney, et al. v. Warren,et al., case no. 23CV003653, for motor vehicle and general negligence.The Warrens tendered the Sacramento case to Farmers for defense and indemnity. Farmersagreed to defend the Warrens subject to a reservation of rights. In this matter, Farmers seeks ajudicial declaration of its rights and duties under the applicable insurance policy regarding theSeptember 2022 motor vehicle accident and underlying litigation.The Warrens now demur to the complaint or in the alternative, move to stay the declaratory reliefaction pending resolution of the Sacramento matter. The Warrens concurrently move to strike thecomplaint.LEGAL STANDARDA demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of factual allegations in a complaint. (Title Ins. Co. v.Comerica Bank-California (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 800, 807.) A plaintiff must plead facts as are SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 23CV050245: FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE vs WARREN, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF FARMERS' COMPLAINT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; filed by Andrew Warren (Defendant) + in Department 20necessary to acquaint a defendant with the nature, source and extent of her claims to providedefendant with notice of the issues sufficient to enable preparation of a defense. (Doe v. City ofLos Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 531, 570.) A court should not sustain a general demurrer unlessthe complaint liberally construed fails to state a cause of action on any theory. (Kramer v. IntuitInc. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 574, 578.)The court may strike any “irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading,” or maystrike out all or any part of a pleading “not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of thisstate, a rule of court, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.)“To eliminate the risk of inconsistent factual determinations that could prejudice the insured, astay of the declaratory relief action pending resolution of the third party suit is appropriate whenthe coverage question turns on facts to be litigated in the underlying action.” (MontroseChemical Corp. v. Superior Court (1993) 6 Cal.4th 287, 301-302, internal citations omitted.)DISCUSSIONAs an initial matter, there is no proof of service on file to demonstrate timely notice of thedemurrer and motion to strike to Plaintiff. However, where, as here, a timely opposition is onfile, and Plaintiff does not request a continuance of the hearing and does not claim prejudice byreason of insufficient notice or service, any claim of inadequate service or notice is waived.(Carlton v. Quint (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 690, 697.) The Court notes that Defendants also failedto file the proof of service as to its earlier motion to quash. Defendants are reminded that proofsof service must be filed with the Court to demonstrate proper notice pursuant to C.C.P. § 1005.DemurrerDefendants demur to the complaint on the grounds that (1) Farmers fails to state facts sufficientto support its claim for declaratory relief; (2) the complaint is uncertain, ambiguous; and (3)unintelligible; and the complaint is “devoid of any undisputed facts or facts that can be judiciallynoticed.”The Complaint Adequately Alleges Declaratory ReliefA cause of action for declaratory relief needs to only set forth facts showing the existence of anactual controversy relating to the legal rights and duties of the respective parties under a contractand requests that these rights and duties be adjudged by the court. (Columbia Pictures Corp. v.De Toth (1945) 26 Cal.2d 753, 760.)The Complaint alleges that an actual, present, and justiciable controversy exists between theparties because the Warrens are seeking defense and indemnity under an insurance policy for the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 23CV050245: FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE vs WARREN, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF FARMERS' COMPLAINT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; filed by Andrew Warren (Defendant) + in Department 20Sacramento action, whereas Farmers argues that no coverage is available because of an exclusionwithin the policy barring coverage for actions “[a]rising out of the use or operation by an insuredperson of any car while it is being used to flee a law enforcement agent or crime scene.”(Complaint ¶¶ 19, 27, 29.) The Complaint attaches the police report and the complaint in theSacramento action in support of its claim that Matthew Warren’s actions fall under the insurancepolicy’s exclusion. (Complaint Exhs. 1 and 2.)The Complaint adequately alleges a cause of action for declaratory relief. On the grounds that thecomplaint fails to state facts to state a cause of action, the demurrer is OVERRULED.The Complaint is Not UncertainUnder C.C.P. § 430.10, subdivision (f), a complaint is subject to demurrer where the pleading isuncertain, that is, ambiguous and unintelligible. Demurrers for uncertainty are disfavored and aregranted only if the pleading is so incomprehensible that a defendant cannot reasonably respond.(Morris v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 279, 292.)While the demurrer states that it is made on the grounds of uncertainty (Demurrer at p. 2),Defendants’ memorandum of points and authorities is devoid of any factual or legal argument tosupport this contention. As discussed above, the complaint adequately alleges a cause of actionfor declaratory relief.On the grounds that the complaint is uncertain, the demurrer is OVERRULED.At the Pleading Stage, the Complaint is Adequately PledThe Warrens argue that the complaint is subject to demurrer because it is devoid of anyundisputed facts or facts that can be judicially noticed. (Demurrer at pp. 1, 3.) Defendantscontend that the allegations in the Sacramento action and the statements in the police report areinadmissible hearsay.However, a complaint is not required at the pleadings stage to assert undisputed facts (as in amotion for summary judgment or adjudication) or solely judicially noticeable facts. Generally,the rule for pleading in civil cases is that the complaint need only set forth ultimate factsconstituting its causes of action, not the evidence by which a plaintiff proposes to prove thosefacts. (Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores California (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 1234, 1260.) Aplaintiff is only required to set forth essential facts of her cause with reasonable precision andwith particularity sufficient to acquaint a defendant with the nature, source, and extent of herclaims. (Ludgate Ins. Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 592, 608.) Specificityis pleadings is generally not required in light of modern discovery procedures. (Id.) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 23CV050245: FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE vs WARREN, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF FARMERS' COMPLAINT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; filed by Andrew Warren (Defendant) + in Department 20A Stay of This Action Will Avoid Potential Prejudice to the Warrens in the SacramentoCaseAs an alternative to their demurrer, the Warrens move to stay the instant insurance coverageaction pending final resolution of the underlying Sacramento action. The Warrens argue that thestay is appropriate to avoid the risk of inconsistent factual determinations that could prejudicethem, as the insured of Plaintiff, as the coverage question at issue in this action turns on facts tobe litigated in the underlying action.Upon review of the complaint in the Sacramento action, attached as Exhibit 2 to the Complaintin the instant case, the Court agrees that a stay is appropriate. In the Sacramento case, plaintiffsKevin McKenney and Angel Sanchez allege that Matthew Warren failed to submit to a stop bythe California Highway Patrol, “attempted to flee and ran a red light when his vehicle collidedwith a vehicle.” (Sacramento Complaint p. 4.) The Sacramento complaint alleges motor vehiclenegligence and general negligence against Matthew and Andrew Warren.Here, Farmers disputes that coverage is available to the Warrens in the Sacramento actionbecause the insurance policy does not insure bodily injury when an insured flees lawenforcement. (Complaint at ¶¶ 19, 27-28.) Farmers alleges that the underlying incident “aroseout of Matthew Warren’s use of his vehicle to flee law enforcement agents.” (Id. at ¶ 27.) As theissue in this declaratory relief action turns on facts to be litigated in the Sacramento case, interalia, whether Matthew Warren used his vehicle to flee law enforcement agents when his vehiclecollided with another vehicle, a stay is appropriate to eliminate the risk of inconsistent factualdeterminations that could prejudice the Warrens. (Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior Court,supra, 6 Cal.4th at 301-302.)The Court STAYS the instant proceedings pending resolution of Sacramento Case No.23CV003653.Motion to StrikeDefendants move to strike the entire complaint on the grounds on the same grounds argued intheir demurrer – that the complaint relies on facts not subject to judicial notice and inadmissiblehearsay. As the Court finds that the complaint is adequately pleaded at this stage in theproceedings, the motion to strike is DENIED.EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONSOn Reply, Defendants object to Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 included in the Oppositionpapers on the grounds that they constitute protected attorney-client communications. Exhibits 2-5are email communications from January – February 2024 between counsel for Farmers and SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 23CV050245: FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CALIFORNIA RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE vs WARREN, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF FARMERS' COMPLAINT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; filed by Andrew Warren (Defendant) + in Department 20defense counsel.The Court finds that the communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege as theyare communications between Farmers’ counsel and the Warrens’ independent counsel regardingservice of Farmers’ declaratory relief complaint and meet and confer regarding the Warrens’demurrer. Andrew Warren is copied on some of the emails from defense counsel, but none of theemails are from Mr. Warren nor directed specifically at Mr. Warren.Pursuant to the foregoing, Defendants’ objections to Exhibits 2, 3, 4 and 5 are OVERRULED.If a party does not timely contest the foregoing Tentative Ruling and appear at the hearing, theTentative Ruling will become the order of the court.HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING?THROUGH ECOURTNotify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before thescheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps:1. Log into eCourt Public Portal2. Case Search3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search”4. Select the Case Name5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling”7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting8. Select “Proceed”BY EMAILSend an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM onecourt day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitationsto counsel to appear remotely.BOTH ECOURT AND EMAIL notices are required.

Ruling

MICHAEL ELY ET AL VS. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION ET AL

Jul 25, 2024 |CGC19579882

Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, Jul-25-2024, Line 1, DEFENDANT UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION's Motion To Compel. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: The unopposed motion of Defendant United Services Automobile Association is granted. Plaintiffs shall provide code-compliant verified responses without objections to Defendant's First Supplemental Interrogatories and First Supplemental Requests for Production of Documents within 14 days of service of notice of entry of this order. The Court also notes that this motion improperly combined two motions and violates the filing fee requirements of Govt. C. Sec. 70617(a)(f). For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Discovery Department 302. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JPT)

Ruling

2024CUPT025644 IN THE MATTER OF G.N.

Jul 22, 2024 |Benjamin F. Coats |Petition For Approval for Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights Pursuant to California Insurance Code 10134 ET SEQ. |2024CUPT025644

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Tentative Ruling 2024CUPT025644: IN THE MATTER OF G.N. 07/22/2024 in Department 43 Petition For Approval for Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights Pursuant to California Insurance Code 10134 ET SEQ.The morning calendar in courtroom 43 will normally begin at 8:45. Please arrive for your hearingno later than 8:30 a.m. The door will be opened before the calendar is called.The Court allows appearances by CourtCall and Zoom, but parties must both use the same platformif appearing remotely. The court’s equipment is not capable of handling mixed remoteappearances. Counsel are expected to cooperate in this regard. Refer to the Courtroom 43 webpagefor more information about remote appearances.If appearing by CourtCall, call in no later than 8:30 a.m. If you wish to appear by CourtCall, youmust make arrangements with CourtCall by 4:00 p.m. the court day before your scheduled hearing.Requests for approval of a CourtCall appearance made on the morning of the hearing will not begranted. No exceptions will be made.For Zoom appearances, you must email the court at Courtroom43@ventura.courts.ca.gov with asimultaneous copy to all other counsel/self-represented parties no later than 3:00 p.m. the courtday before the appearance. INCLUDE THE PHRASE "ZOOM APPEARANCE ON (DATE OFHEARING)" IN THE SUBJECT LINE OF YOUR EMAIL. You will receive the login informationfor your appearance in reply to your email. If appearing by Zoom, log into the hearing no laterthan 8:30 a.m. The Court will transfer you to the meeting room when your matter is called. Do notattempt to appear by Zoom without following these instructions.With respect to the tentative ruling below, no notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish tosubmit on the tentative ruling you can fax notice to Judge Coats's secretary, Ms. McIntyre at 805-477-5894, stating that you submit on the tentative. Or, you may emailCourtroom43@ventura.courts.ca.gov with all counsel copied on the email. Do not call in lieu ofsending a fax or email. If you submit on the tentative without appearing and the opposing partyappears, the hearing will be conducted in your absence. If you are the moving party and do notcommunicate to the Court that you submit on the tentative or you do not appear at the hearing, theCourt may deny your motion irrespective of the tentative.Unless stated otherwise at the hearing, if a formal order is required but not signed at the hearing,the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a),(b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with thecourt. A "notice of ruling" in lieu of this procedure is not authorized.Motion: Petition for approval of transfer of structured settlement rights.Tentative Ruling: The petition is GRANTED. 2024CUPT025644: IN THE MATTER OF G.N.The Court has considered the following factors:(1) The reasonable preference and desire of the payee to complete the proposed transaction,considering the payee's age, mental capacity, legal knowledge, and apparent maturity level.(2) The stated purpose of the transfer is to purchase a vehicle and pay off debt.(3) The payee's financial and economic situation: The Petitioner, Gladis Nava, is 21 years old andlives in Oxnard. There is no indication whether she is employed or has another source of income.She does not have any court ordered child support obligations. (Exhibit D.)(4) The terms of the transaction, including whether the payee is transferring monthly or lump sumpayments or all or a portion of his or her future payments: Nava is selling certain payments underthe structure settlement amount to $84,261.56 for $30,000. (Exhibit D ¶¶7 & 8.) She will retainthe remainder of her interest in the structured settlement. (Exhibit D ¶10.)(5) Whether, when the settlement was completed, the future periodic payments that are the subjectof the proposed transfer were intended to pay for the future medical care and treatment of the payeerelating to injuries sustained by the payee in the incident that was the subject of the settlement andwhether the payee still needs those future payments to pay for that future care and treatment: Theyare not. (Exhibit D)(6) Whether, when the settlement was completed, the future periodic payments that are the subjectof the proposed transfer were intended to provide for the necessary living expenses of the payeeand whether the payee still needs the future structured settlement payments to pay for futurenecessary living expenses: They are not. (Exhibit D).(7) Whether the payee is, at the time of the proposed transfer, likely to require future medical careand treatment for the injuries that the payee sustained in connection with the incident that was thesubject of the settlement and whether the payee lacks other resources, including insurance,sufficient to cover those future medical expenses: She is not.(8) Whether the payee has other means of income or support, aside from the structured settlementpayments that are the subject of the proposed transfer, sufficient to meet the payee's future financialobligations for maintenance and support of the payee's dependents, specifically including, but notlimited to, the payee's child support obligations, if any: Petitioner has no minor children and nochild support obligations. (Exhibit D)(9) Whether the financial terms of the transaction, including the discount rate applied to determinethe amount to be paid to the payee, the expenses and costs of the transaction for both the payeeand the transferee, the size of the transaction, the available financial alternatives to the payee toachieve the payee's stated objectives, are fair and reasonable. They are reasonable.(10) Whether the payee completed previous transactions involving the payee's structuredsettlement payments and the timing and size of the previous transactions and whether the payeewas satisfied with any previous transaction: She has not previously sold payments. (Exhibit D). 2024CUPT025644: IN THE MATTER OF G.N.(11) Whether the transferee attempted previous transactions involving the payee's structuredsettlement payments that were denied, or that were dismissed or withdrawn prior to a decision onthe merits, within the past five years: She has not.(12) Whether, to the best of the transferee's knowledge after making inquiry with the payee, thepayee has attempted structured settlement payment transfer transactions with another person orentity, other than the transferee, that were denied, or which were dismissed or withdrawn prior toa decision on the merits, within the past five years. It does not appear to be the case.(13) Whether the payee, or his or her family or dependents, are in or are facing a hardship situation:This is not clear.(14) Whether the payee received independent legal or financial advice regarding the transaction:She declined advice.(15) Any other factors or facts that the payee, the transferee, or any other interested party calls tothe attention of the reviewing court or that the court determines should be considered in reviewingthe transfer. No other relevant factors.The Court makes the following findings:1) The transfer is in the best interest of the payee, taking into account the welfare and support ofthe payee's dependents.(2) The payee has been advised in writing by the transferee to seek independent professional adviceregarding the transfer and has either received that advice or knowingly waived, in writing, theopportunity to receive the advice.(3) The transferee has complied with the notification requirements pursuant to paragraph (2) ofsubdivision (f), the transferee has provided the payee with a disclosure form that complies withSection 10136, and the transfer agreement complies with Sections 10136 and 10138.(4) The transfer does not contravene any applicable statute or the order of any court or othergovernment authority.(5) The payee understands the terms of the transfer agreement, including the terms set forth in thedisclosure statement required by Section 10136.(6) The payee understands and does not wish to exercise the payee's right to cancel the transferagreement.The Court will sign the proposed order.

Ruling

WOOLSEY vs STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 22, 2024 |CVSW2206963

WOOLSEY VS STATE FARMCVSW2206963 GENERAL INSURANCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTCOMPANYTentative Ruling:The hearing has been continued on the court’s own motion due to Crowdstrikeshutdown issues.

Document

COURTNEY, JONATHAN V MONARCH NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 22, 2024 |Carolyn R. Bell |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006860-XXXA-MB

Document

HALSTEAD, PILAR V HERITAGE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 24, 2024 |Luis Delgado |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-007026-XXXA-MB

Document

JEAN BAPTISTE, GERDA V UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 23, 2024 |G. Joseph Curley |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006933-XXXA-MB

Document

CABRERA SOLORZANO, ANDRES OSCAR V CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

Jul 23, 2024 |Bradley G. Harper |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006891-XXXA-MB

Document

NEUROSURGICAL CONSULTANTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC V AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 19, 2024 |Maxine D. Cheesman |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006792-XXXA-MB

Document

NEUROSURGICAL CONSULTANTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC V CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 18, 2024 |John J. Parnofiello |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006735-XXXA-MB

Document

MENESES, WILLIAM V CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

Jul 17, 2024 |Scott R. Kerner |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006745-XXXA-MB

Document

NEUROSURGICAL CONSULTANTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC V AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Jul 19, 2024 |Maxine D. Cheesman |INSURANCE CLAIM |50-2024-CA-006792-XXXA-MB

COMPLAINT June 18, 2018 (2024)
Top Articles
13 Best Tents for Summer 2024 - WOW Travel
These Truly ~Luxe~ Glamping Tents Will Give You the Ultimate Summer Setup
Uca Cheerleading Nationals 2023
Dlnet Retiree Login
Jailbase Orlando
Cash4Life Maryland Winning Numbers
Katmoie
Body Rubs Austin Texas
27 Places With The Absolute Best Pizza In NYC
Pbr Wisconsin Baseball
Bowlero (BOWL) Earnings Date and Reports 2024
Craigslist Blackshear Ga
Uktulut Pier Ritual Site
Www Craigslist Milwaukee Wi
SF bay area cars & trucks "chevrolet 50" - craigslist
Unforeseen Drama: The Tower of Terror’s Mysterious Closure at Walt Disney World
Busted Newspaper Fauquier County Va
Program Logistics and Property Manager - Baghdad, Iraq
Never Give Up Quotes to Keep You Going
Free Personals Like Craigslist Nh
2013 Ford Fusion Serpentine Belt Diagram
Yog-Sothoth
A Cup of Cozy – Podcast
Foolproof Module 6 Test Answers
Bn9 Weather Radar
Parkeren Emmen | Reserveren vanaf €9,25 per dag | Q-Park
Kimoriiii Fansly
The Collective - Upscale Downtown Milwaukee Hair Salon
Nikki Catsouras: The Tragic Story Behind The Face And Body Images
Poe T4 Aisling
How Much Is An Alignment At Costco
Indiana Jones 5 Showtimes Near Jamaica Multiplex Cinemas
Everything You Need to Know About NLE Choppa
Wednesday Morning Gifs
Closest 24 Hour Walmart
A Man Called Otto Showtimes Near Amc Muncie 12
Reborn Rich Ep 12 Eng Sub
450 Miles Away From Me
Mvnt Merchant Services
140000 Kilometers To Miles
US-amerikanisches Fernsehen 2023 in Deutschland schauen
Dragon Ball Super Super Hero 123Movies
Scythe Banned Combos
Copd Active Learning Template
Zom 100 Mbti
Craigslist Sparta Nj
Blippi Park Carlsbad
Blog Pch
Craiglist.nj
March 2023 Wincalendar
Divisadero Florist
Suzanne Olsen Swift River
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 5725

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.